21

School of the Art Institute of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois · Private Nonprofit · 77.5% acceptance rate

ROI Score: 21/100 · Poor Value

The School of the Art Institute of Chicago (SAIC) scores 21 (Poor Value) -- one of the lowest ROI scores on this site. The core problem is a $49,790 average net price against $28,800 median 6-year earnings and a 65.8-year payback period. Median debt is $27,000 with a debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.938. The completion rate of 67.0% is reasonable for an art school, but earnings outcomes are structurally weak because SAIC produces one category of graduate -- fine and studio artists -- into one of the lowest-paying creative labor markets. The repayment rate of 67.1% confirms ongoing debt stress. Families should understand this clearly: attending SAIC is a financially costly commitment to an arts career, not a wealth-building investment.

Payback Period
>50 yr
Years until earnings premium covers total investment
Net Price / Year
$49,790
$199,160 over 4 years after aid
10-Year Earnings
$40,151
Median graduate 10 years after entry
Debt / Earnings
0.94
$27,000 median debt vs first-year salary

School of the Art Institute of Chicago

21
ROI ScorePoor Value
Earnings Premium
9(0.03x)
Payback Period
11(>50 yr)
Debt / Earnings
7(0.94)
Completion Rate
73(67%)
Repayment Rate
32(67%)

Quick Numbers

In-state tuition + fees$56,420/yr
Out-of-state tuition + fees$56,420/yr
Average net price$49,790/yr
Total 4-year cost (net)$199,160
Median earnings (10yr post-entry)$40,151
Median earnings (6yr post-entry)$28,800
Median debt at graduation$27,000
Estimated monthly loan payment$286
Estimated payback period>50 years
6-year graduation rate67.0%
Undergraduate enrollment2,805

Data as of 2024-2025. Source: College Scorecard API (U.S. Department of Education).

The Full Financial Picture

The sticker price at School of the Art Institute of Chicago is $56,420/year. But sticker price isn't what most students pay. After grants, scholarships, and financial aid, the average student pays a net price of $49,790/year, or roughly $199,160 over four years.

That net price varies significantly by family income. The lowest-income families (under $30,000/year) pay an average of $43,798/year, while families earning over $110,000 pay $55,790/year.

The median graduate leaves with $27,000 in federal loan debt, translating to an estimated monthly payment of $286 on a standard 10-year repayment plan. Against median earnings of $40,151 ten years out, the debt-to-earnings ratio is 0.94 - within the recommended range but worth monitoring.

Net Price by Family Income

What families actually pay after grants and scholarships, by income bracket.

Family IncomeAvg Net Price/Year
$0 - $30,000$43,798
$30,001 - $48,000$39,845
$48,001 - $75,000$46,708
$75,001 - $110,000$49,595
$110,001+$55,790

Cost by Income Bracket Explained

Lower-income families (under $30K)

Families earning under $30,000 pay $43,798 net price per year at SAIC -- an extraordinarily high figure for low-income students. This exceeds the median 6-year earnings of $28,800 by nearly $15,000. The aid program does not adequately protect low-income students from financial exposure, and the debt-to-earnings outcomes for this population are severe.

Middle-income families ($30K-$110K)

Middle-income families ($48,001-$75,000) pay $46,708 per year. Families in the $75,001-$110,000 band pay $49,595. Both brackets face a cost structure that cannot be justified by earnings data alone. Families who can fund SAIC from savings or income without borrowing are in a materially different position than those who must borrow.

Higher-income families ($110K+)

Families earning $110,000+ pay $55,790 per year -- roughly $223,000 over four years at sticker. For families who can fund this out of pocket and view it as cultural or vocational investment rather than a financial return, the calculus is different. Borrowing at this cost level against fine arts earnings is not defensible on the numbers.

Earnings by Major

Top 1 most popular majors at School of the Art Institute of Chicago with available earnings data.

MajorMedian EarningsGrade
Fine and Studio Arts$45,602F

Earnings reflect median 4-year post-completion (or 1-year where 4-year unavailable). Grades based on debt-to-earnings ratio.

Program Analysis

Why these programs deliver their earnings outcomes.

Fine and Studio Arts

Fine and Studio Arts is SAIC's only reported Scorecard program: 581 graduates, $23,984 year-one median earnings, $45,602 at year four, and a debt-to-earnings ratio of 1.126 (ROI grade F). Graduates owe more than a full year's salary on day one. The year-four figure of $45,602 represents the median, meaning half of graduates earn less than that six years post-enrollment. This outcome is not unique to SAIC -- it reflects the fine arts labor market broadly -- but SAIC's $49,790 net price makes the math especially unfavorable.

How Graduates Do

Earnings

6 years after entry$28,800
-$6,200 vs. HS grad
10 years after entry$40,151
+$5,151 vs. HS grad
Annual earnings premium$5,151
Over median HS graduate ($35,000)

Loan Repayment

MetricThis SchoolNat'l Avg
1-year repayment60.8%52.0%
3-year repayment67.1%62.0%
5-year repayment65.4%68.0%
7-year repayment69.7%72.0%

Completion Rate

0%National avg: 60.0%100%
67.0%
6-year rate

Admissions Snapshot

Acceptance rate77.5%
Enrollment2,805
Pell Grant recipients18.7%
Avg faculty salary (monthly)$11,628

SAIC's 77.5% admission rate is moderately selective by art school standards but not highly restrictive. No SAT or ACT data is published. The portfolio and creative work evaluation drives admissions decisions more than academic metrics. The admission rate means admitted students are a filtered creative cohort, but the earnings outcomes reflect the structural constraints of the fine arts labor market regardless of institutional selectivity.

Compared to Similar Schools

Peer institutions matched by type, size, and selectivity.

SAIC's Scorecard peer schools include Augustana College, Aurora University, Campbellsville University, and Everglades University -- a mixed group that shares little institutional similarity with a major urban art school. None of these peers is a meaningful benchmark for SAIC's specialized mission. Among art-focused institutions nationally, SAIC's net price and earnings outcomes are representative of the category, not outliers. The ROI score of 21 reflects the structural economics of art school, not institutional dysfunction.

SchoolROINet Price10yr Earnings
School of the Art Institute of Chicago (this school)
21
$49,790$40,151
Augustana College
67
$22,736$62,971
Aurora University
66
$18,838$58,709
Campbellsville University
25
$19,341$41,583
Everglades University
24
$27,371$47,597
Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies
24
$20,473$47,327

Who Thrives Here

SAIC admits 77.5% of applicants with a Pell grant rate of 18.7% -- a comparatively low share of low-income students for the price point. At 2,805 students, it is a mid-sized specialized art school in a major city. SAIC is appropriate for students with a genuine commitment to professional fine arts careers and a financial plan that does not depend on a traditional earnings payback. It is not appropriate for students who need a degree to produce income that services the debt incurred to earn it.

The Verdict: The Numbers Don't Add Up

Poor Value

The financial data raises serious concerns about School of the Art Institute of Chicago. With a net cost of $49,790 per year and median graduate earnings of only $40,151 ten years out, the estimated payback period exceeds >50 years. For most students, the financial return does not justify the cost.

Areas of concern include weak earnings relative to cost and high debt relative to what graduates earn and concerning loan repayment rates and a long payback period.

Median debt of $27,000 against $40,151 in earnings is reasonable, though major choice matters significantly. Students in higher-earning programs will see better returns.

Rankings & Links

Guides & Tools

Data: College Scorecard API (U.S. Department of Education)

Vintage: 2024-2025 · Last updated: 2026-03-25

Earnings reflect median outcomes for all federal financial aid recipients. Individual results vary by major, effort, and career path.